Which factor is sometimes overlooked in the evaluation of green chemistry?

Disable ads (and more) with a premium pass for a one time $4.99 payment

Ready for the ASU CEE181 Final Exam? Study with flashcards and detailed explanations. Prepare to excel in Technological, Social, and Sustainable Systems.

In evaluations of green chemistry, all identified factors play significant roles in determining the sustainability and effectiveness of chemical processes. Often, there is a tendency to focus primarily on the chemical reactions and the environmental impacts directly associated with them, which can lead to oversight of a more comprehensive evaluation.

Economic implications are crucial because the viability of green chemistry solutions often hinges on their cost-effectiveness relative to conventional methods. If the green alternatives are prohibitively expensive, they may not be adopted, regardless of their environmental benefits.

The entire system in which a chemical is used encompasses the lifecycle of the chemical, including production, application, and disposal. Failing to consider this system can lead to incomplete assessments of potential hazards or environmental impacts, as the broader context can significantly influence outcomes.

Social implications account for the societal acceptance, health impacts, and ethical considerations associated with chemical use. Understanding how a community perceives and responds to green chemistry initiatives is essential for successful implementation and long-term sustainability.

To fully grasp the impact of green chemistry, it is critical to integrate economic, systemic, and social factors in evaluations, as neglecting any of these can undermine the overall goal of promoting sustainability in the chemical industry.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy