Are ethical questions regarding trade-offs between transcendent values considered to have "right" answers?

Ethical questions regarding trade-offs between transcendent values are inherently complex and subjective, which makes the implication of having definitive "right" answers misleading. Transcendent values, such as justice, freedom, or equality, often come into conflict with one another, creating dilemmas where individuals must weigh the significance of each value based on context, perspective, and social norms.

In ethical discussions, particularly those involving trade-offs, it is commonly recognized that assessments may lead to different conclusions based on differing moral philosophies, cultural perspectives, and situational factors. While there may be widely accepted principles or frameworks for analyzing these questions, claiming that there are "right" answers oversimplifies the rich dialogue and nuanced perspectives surrounding ethical decision-making. This is why the assertion that ethical questions regarding trade-offs between transcendent values are considered to have definitive "right" answers is not accurate.